Kaythampillai LN, Jakiel M, Urbaniak J, Bereza T, Kowalski W, Loukas M. WalochaJ: Pelvic autonomic nervous system – an overview. Folia med Krakow. 2018;58(2):21–44.
Google Scholar
Seracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Mastronardi M, Raimondo R, Arena A, Simona DF, Mariani GA, Billi AM, Manzoli L. Michael O’Guin, Lemos N: Anatomical mapping of the hypogastric nerve and autonomy during radical pelvic surgery. Surgical insight procedure for nerve preservation. J Minim Invas GYN. 2019;26(7):1340–5.
Google Scholar
Yoham AL, Bordoni B. Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, inferior hypogastric plexus. Europe PMC Plus 2021, 24 (2).
Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, Kehoe ST, Konishi I, Olawaiye AB, Prat J, et al. Revised FIGO staging classification for cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.
Google Scholar
Guimarães YM, Godoy LR, Longat-Filho A, Reis RD. Management of early cervical cancer: a literature review. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14(3).
Rebecca CR, Marios L, Shane R. Anatomical complications of hysterectomy: a review. Clin Anat. 2017;30:946–52.
Google Scholar
Iannielli MM, Raimondo D, Rosati A, Cocci L, Trozzi R, Maretta M, Raffone A, Campolo F, Benaduce G, et al. Effects of nerve-sparing posterolateral parametrectomy for deeply infiltrating endometriosis on postoperative bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(1):152–9.
Google Scholar
Rosati A, Pavone M, Campolo F et al Surgical and functional impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for deep parametrial endometriosis: a single-center experience. A look at the facts about obstetrics and gynecology. 2022;14(2):121–7.
Google Scholar
Laterza RM, Sievert KD, de Ridder D, Vierhout ME, Haab F, Cardozo L, van Kerrebroeck P, Cruz F, Kelleher C, Chapple C, et al. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurorollurodin. 2015;34(4):309–15.
Google Scholar
Kim NK, Kim YW, Cho MS. Total mesorectal resection for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: expert technical tips for robotic surgery. Sarg Oncor. 2015;24(3):172–80.
Google Scholar
Haeswinkel MH, Sprangers MA, van der Velden J, van der Vaart CH, Stalpers LJ, Berger MP, Luvers JP. Long-term survivors of cervical cancer suffer from pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional matched cohort study. Guinecol Oncol. 2010;117(2):281–6.
Google Scholar
Danford JM, Wu E. Posthysterectomy urinary dysfunction: incidence, risk factors, and management. Curr Bladder Dysfunction Rep. 2017;12(4):298–304.
Google Scholar
Konishi I. Okabayashi radical hysterectomy: basic principles and step-by-step procedures. Sarge J. (New York). 2021;7(Supplement 2):57–S69.
Google Scholar
Y. Yabuki, A. Asamoto, T. Hoshiba, Y. Nishimoto, Y. Nishikawa, T. Nakajima, Radical hysterectomy: anatomical evaluation of parametrectomy. Guinecol Oncol. 2000;77(1):155–63.
Google Scholar
Yutaka Yabuki et al. A new proposal for radical hysterectomy. Gynecologic oncology. 1996;62:370–8.
Ahaan RP. Pollack: Guidelines for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecological Cancer. 2002;12:319–21.
Google Scholar
Lucas R, Michael H. Helena R: Nerve-sparing and customized surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncor. 2010;11:292–301.
Google Scholar
Ripperda CM, Jackson LA, Phelan JN, Carrick KS, Courton MM. Anatomical relationships of the pelvic autonomic nervous system in female cadavers: clinical application to pelvic surgery. I am a J Obstet gynecologist. 2017;216(4):388. e381-388 e387.
Google Scholar
Kutlu B, Guner MA, Akyol C, Gungor Y, Benlice C, Arslan MN, Acar HI, Kuzu MA. Comprehensive anatomy of the superior epigastric plexus and its relationship to pelvic surgical landmarks: Defining the safety zone around the promontory. Technology Coroproctol. 2022;26(8):655–64.
Google Scholar
Correia JA, De-Ary-Pires B, Pires-Neto MA, De Ary-Pires R. Developmental anatomy of the human epigastric plexus: a morphometric study with clinical and surgical correlations. Clin Anat. 2010;23(8):962–70.
Google Scholar
Kim H, Nam YS, Lee Yui, Kim IB, Kim YS. Anatomy of the superior epigastric plexus and its application in nerve-sparing periaortic lymphadenectomy. Folia Morfor (Walsch). 2021;80(1):70–5.
Google Scholar
Paraskevas G, Tsitsopoulos P, Papaziogas B, Natsis K, Martoglou S, Stoltidou A, Kitsoulis P. Morphological diversity of the inferior epigastric plexus and its clinical application: a cadaveric study. Saag Radiolu Anat. 2008;30(6):481–8.
Google Scholar
Zahari A, Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Mastronardi M, Seracchioli R, Mattei B, Papillon-Smith J, Solnik MJ, Murzi A, Lemos N. Keeping landmarks close and hypogastric nerves close: nerve-sparing uterus Approach to endometriosis surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(4):813–4.
Google Scholar
Aurore V, Rothlisberger R, Boemke N, Hlushchuk R, Bangerter H, Bergmann M, Imboden S, Mueller MD, Eppler E, Djonov V. Anatomy of the female pelvic nerves: a gross study of the hypogastric plexus and its relationships and changes. . J Anat. 2020;237(3):487–94.
Google Scholar
Mauroy B, Demondion X, Bizet B, Claret A, Mestdagh P, Hurt C. The female lower abdominal (= pelvic) plexus: anatomical and radiological description of the plexus and its atria – application to pelvic surgery. Saag Radiolu Anat. 2007;29(1):55–66.
Google Scholar
Park NY, Cho YL, Park IS, Lee YS. Laparoscopic pelvic anatomy for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Clin Anat. 2010;23(2):186–91.
Google Scholar
Peters A, Stuparich MA, Mansoria SM, Lee TT. Anatomical vascular considerations in uterine artery origin ligation during laparoscopic hysterectomy. I am a J Obstet gynecologist. 2016;215(3):393e391–393.
Google Scholar
Li H, Jia J, Xiao Y, Kang L, Cui H. Anatomical basis of the female pelvic cavity for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Saag Radiolu Anat. 2015;37(6):657–65.
Google Scholar
T. Kiyomatsu, T. Ishihara, K. Murono, K. Otani, K. Yasuda, T. Nishikawa, T. Tanaka, K. Hata, K. Kawai, H. Nozawa, et al. Anatomy of the middle rectal artery: a review of historical literature. Sarg today. 2016;47(1):14–9.
Google Scholar
Heinze T, Fletcher J, Miskovic D, Stelzner S, Bayer A, Wedel T. Middle rectal artery: revisiting the anatomy and surgical implications of a neglected vessel. Colorectal. 2023;66(3):477–85.
Google Scholar
Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of motor innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Guinecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):154–7.
Google Scholar
Centini G, Labanca L, Giorgi M, Martire FG, Catania F, Zupi E, Lazzeri L. Implications of nerve and vascular anatomy in the treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Klin Anat 2023.
He M, Muro S, Akita K. Positional relationship between the lateral border of Denonvilliers’ fascia and the pelvic plexus. Anat Sci Inst 2022;97(1):101–9.
Google Scholar
Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Bandai M, Baba T, Yoshioka S. Anatomical identification and functional outcome of nerve-sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Guinecol Oncol. 2007;107(1):4–13.
Google Scholar
Bizzarri N, Ianieri MM, Rosati A, Pedone Anchora L, Ronsini C, Ladisa I, Cavinato M, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ricambia G, Querleu D. Consensus on Gemini terminology of surgical anatomy for radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecological Cancer. 2023;33(6):876–81.
Google Scholar
Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Bandai M, Baba T. Precise anatomy of the vesicouterine ligament for radical hysterectomy. Guinecol Oncol. 2007;104(1):186–91.
Google Scholar
Diaz-Feijoo B, Rius M, Gracia M, Agusti N, Carmona F. Pelvic anatomy for gynecologic oncologists: the autonomic plexus. Int J Gynecological Cancer. 2021;31(6):936–7.
Google Scholar